Audit and harden
Security work should produce decisions, not vague fear. We review code, hosting, dependencies, WordPress/WooCommerce exposure, authentication flows and operational risk, then turn findings into tasks developers can execute.
Scope
Fit
The objective is not a long PDF that nobody can act on. We identify exploitable weaknesses, explain impact, agree priorities and help technical teams remediate. The scope can be a focused review, OWASP Top 10 assessment, WordPress/WooCommerce hardening or a more formal penetration test when the project needs that level of evidence.
Common situations
Stack
Output
FAQ
It can be, when scoped. Some projects need a practical security review and hardening plan; others need formal web-focused penetration testing. The scope is agreed before work starts.
Yes. Reviews can include themes, plugins, admin exposure, forms, checkout-related flows, update hygiene, permissions and server configuration.
Yes. Findings are written as a technical report with evidence, impact and remediation notes so they can be turned into implementation tasks.
Yes. OWASP Top 10 is used as a reference point for web application reviews, without claiming external certification or compliance unless that is part of a separate scope.
Yes. Retesting can be included after implementation so corrected issues are checked again before the work is closed.
Related technical notes
Related work
Start here
Send the report, launch pressure or exposed workflow. The first step is to separate urgent risk from planned remediation.
Privacy choices
Cookie preferences
Starter.pt uses strictly necessary website technologies for security, form protection and preference storage. Optional analytics or marketing tools stay disabled unless explicitly accepted.
Read the Cookie PolicyConsent settings
Manage cookie preferences
Choose which optional categories can be used. Strictly necessary technologies cannot be disabled because they are needed for security, form submission and remembering this choice.
